Ad is loading...
PABFX vs RLBAX
PABFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABFX vs RLBAX
PGIM Balanced Z
Price$17.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets963.02M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.00
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.12B
PABFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABFX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABFX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. PABFX (963M). PABFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABFX (2.43) vs RLBAX (1.28). PABFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABFX (32 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PABFX (0.84). PABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PABFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABFX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. PABFX (0.89). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.37 vs. PABFX (28.58).
| PABFX | RLBAX | PABFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.31 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.542 | 0.096 | -568% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 963M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.43 | 1.28 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.89 | 3.43 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.91 | 19.38 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.58 | 32.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.53 | 44.68 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...