Ad is loading...
PACAX vs QBDSX
PACAX vs QBDSX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs QBDSX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.47
Change+$0.11 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets557.81M
Quantified Managed Income Investor
Price$8.07
Change+$0.03 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.99M
PACAX vs QBDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. QBDSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and QBDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 558M vs. QBDSX (201M). QBDSX pays higher dividends than PACAX: QBDSX (3.89) vs PACAX (3.51). PACAX was incepted earlier than QBDSX: PACAX (31 years) vs QBDSX (12 years). QBDSX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). QBDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 718.00 vs. PACAX (372.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QBDSX: PACAX (0) vs QBDSX (10000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. QBDSX (3.07). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.92 vs. QBDSX (-1.95).
| PACAX | QBDSX | PACAX / QBDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.230 | 1.901 | -65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 558M | 201M | 278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 3.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | 3.07 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 0.50 | 1,237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.92 | -1.95 | -458% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.51 | 2.83 | 477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...