Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACRX vs PFIPX
PACRX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts PACRX vs PFIPX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R
Price$11.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets570.32M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
PACRX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACRX vs. PFIPX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACRX is a Buy and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. PACRX (570M). PACRX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: PACRX (2.63) vs PFIPX (2.49). PACRX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: PACRX (23 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). PFIPX (1.26) and PACRX (1.25) have similar cost to investors . PACRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PACRX (0) and PFIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. PACRX (6.20). PFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.04 vs. PACRX (7.91).
| PACRX | PFIPX | PACRX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.26 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.26 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.426 | 5.044 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 2.24B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.49 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 6.97 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.71 | 14.91 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.91 | 11.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.71 | 25.35 | 78% |