Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PADYX vs RCMTX
PADYX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PADYX vs. RCMTX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PADYX is a Hold and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 26.2B vs. PADYX (17.6M). PADYX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: PADYX (3.95) vs RCMTX (0.61). PADYX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: PADYX (5 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). PADYX (3.10) is less costly to investors than RCMTX (1.03). PADYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. RCMTX (5.00). PADYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCMTX: PADYX (0) vs RCMTX (250). RCMTX (8.67) and PADYX (8.56) have marching annual gain over last year.
| PADYX | RCMTX | PADYX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.03 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.10 | 1.03 | 301% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.657 | 6.527 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.6M | 26.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 0.61 | 651% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.56 | 8.67 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 40.29 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 42.20 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement