Ad is loading...
PAFKX vs RCDTX
PAFKX vs RCDTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAFKX vs. RCDTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAFKX is a Hold and RCDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCDTX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. PAFKX (19.8M). PAFKX pays higher dividends than RCDTX: PAFKX (2.68) vs RCDTX (2.18). PAFKX was incepted earlier than RCDTX: PAFKX (5 years) vs RCDTX (18 years). PAFKX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RCDTX (0.95). PAFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCDTX: PAFKX (0) vs RCDTX (250). PAFKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. RCDTX (6.25).
| PAFKX | RCDTX | PAFKX / RCDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.95 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.95 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.096 | 1.808 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 32B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 2.18 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 6.25 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.77 | 11.57 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.80 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...