Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAFRX vs PFFRX
PAFRX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAFRX vs. PFFRX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAFRX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. PAFRX (4.33B). PFFRX (7.49) and PAFRX (7.17) have matching dividends . PAFRX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: PAFRX (14 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). PAFRX (1.04) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. PAFRX (77.90). PAFRX (2500) and PFFRX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFFRX (7.57) and PAFRX (7.24) have marching annual gain over last year. PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.42 vs. PAFRX (35.35).
| PAFRX | PFFRX | PAFRX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.69 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.513 | 3.701 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 4.96B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.17 | 7.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 7.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.94 | 28.46 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.35 | 37.42 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.16 | 62.86 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers