Ad is loading...
PAIKX vs VEMBX
PAIKX vs VEMBX Comparison
Open Charts PAIKX vs VEMBX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Adv
Price$9.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.74B
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Investor
Price$10.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.4B
PAIKX vs VEMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAIKX vs. VEMBX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAIKX is a Hold and VEMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAIKX has more cash in the bank: 4.74B vs. VEMBX (4.4B). VEMBX pays higher dividends than PAIKX: VEMBX (6.73) vs PAIKX (5.83). PAIKX was incepted earlier than VEMBX: PAIKX (10 years) vs VEMBX (9 years). PAIKX (2.60) is less costly to investors than VEMBX (0.50). VEMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. PAIKX (40.20). PAIKX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEMBX: PAIKX (2500) vs VEMBX (3000). VEMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. PAIKX (6.49). VEMBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.01 vs. PAIKX (18.74).
| PAIKX | VEMBX | PAIKX / VEMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.50 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.60 | 0.50 | 520% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.768 | 3.008 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74B | 4.4B | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.83 | 6.73 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 7.97 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.95 | 26.74 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.74 | 25.01 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |