PALAF
Price
$4.72
Change
-$0.15 (-3.08%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
26 days until earnings call
PBMLF
Price
$0.80
Change
+$0.01 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PALAF vs PBMLF

Header iconPALAF vs PBMLF Comparison
Open Charts PALAF vs PBMLFBanner chart's image
Paladin Energy
Price$4.72
Change-$0.15 (-3.08%)
Volume$34.45K
Capitalization1.53B
Pacific Booker Minerals
Price$0.80
Change+$0.01 (+1.27%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization7.74M
PALAF vs PBMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PALAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PALAF vs. PBMLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALAF is a Hold and PBMLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PALAF: $4.72 vs. PBMLF: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: PALAF and PBMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PALAF: 32% vs. PBMLF: 40%
Market capitalization -- PALAF: $1.53B vs. PBMLF: $7.74M
PALAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.53B. PBMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PALAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePBMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PALAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PBMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBMLF is a better buy in the long-term than PALAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PALAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PALAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PBMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PALAF is a better buy in the short-term than PBMLF.

Price Growth

PALAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.72% price change this week, while PBMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -23.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

PALAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PALAF($1.53B) has a higher market cap than PBMLF($7.74M). PBMLF YTD gains are higher at: 119.901 vs. PALAF (4.656). PBMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -906.77K vs. PALAF (-23.79M). PALAF has more cash in the bank: 178M vs. PBMLF (404K). PALAF has higher revenues than PBMLF: PALAF (4.7M) vs PBMLF (0).
PALAFPBMLFPALAF / PBMLF
Capitalization1.53B7.74M19,755%
EBITDA-23.79M-906.77K2,624%
Gain YTD4.656119.9014%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.7M0-
Total Cash178M404K44,059%
Total Debt79.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PALAF vs PBMLF: Fundamental Ratings
PALAF
PBMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
787
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PALAF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (97). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PALAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PALAF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PBMLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PALAF (60). This means that PBMLF’s stock grew similarly to PALAF’s over the last 12 months.

PALAF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PALAFPBMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PALAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDVCX14.440.08
+0.56%
Macquarie Value C
LUSIX10.990.04
+0.37%
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Eq Ins
EQPGX25.670.09
+0.35%
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth I
SGLYX11.23N/A
N/A
SEI Global Managed Volatility Y (SIMT)
NBNCX15.18-0.05
-0.33%
Neuberger Berman International Sel C

PALAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PALAF and AUMC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PALAF and AUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PALAF
1D Price
Change %
PALAF100%
-3.03%
AUMC - PALAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALE - PALAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
CAMZF - PALAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLLTL - PALAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
NB - PALAF
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
More

PBMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBMLF and DBLVF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBMLF and DBLVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBMLF
1D Price
Change %
PBMLF100%
+1.86%
DBLVF - PBMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
ORMNF - PBMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
PALAF - PBMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
PEMSF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+16.67%
PGEZF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
More