Ad is loading...
PALAF
Price
$4.82
Change
-$0.02 (-0.41%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Earnings call today
VALE
Price
$9.81
Change
-$0.02 (-0.20%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
94 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PALAF vs VALE

Header iconPALAF vs VALE Comparison
Open Charts PALAF vs VALEBanner chart's image
Paladin Energy
Price$4.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.41%)
Volume$75.81K
CapitalizationN/A
Vale SA
Price$9.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
Volume$15.47M
CapitalizationN/A
PALAF vs VALE Comparison Chart
Loading...
PALAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VALE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PALAF vs. VALE commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALAF is a Sell and VALE is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PALAF: $4.82 vs. VALE: $9.81)
Brand notoriety: PALAF: Not notable vs. VALE: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PALAF: 195% vs. VALE: 49%
Market capitalization -- PALAF: $1.53B vs. VALE: $51.9B
PALAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.53B. VALE’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $51.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PALAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVALE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PALAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VALE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VALE is a better buy in the long-term than PALAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PALAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VALE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PALAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VALE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PALAF and VALE are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PALAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -24.39% price change this week, while VALE (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

PALAF is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

VALE is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VALE($51.9B) has a higher market cap than PALAF($1.53B). PALAF YTD gains are higher at: -26.970 vs. VALE (-33.021). VALE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. PALAF (-23.79M). VALE has more cash in the bank: 2.92B vs. PALAF (178M). PALAF has less debt than VALE: PALAF (79.5M) vs VALE (16.4B). VALE has higher revenues than PALAF: VALE (40.7B) vs PALAF (4.7M).
PALAFVALEPALAF / VALE
Capitalization1.53B51.9B3%
EBITDA-23.79M15B-0%
Gain YTD-26.970-33.02182%
P/E RatioN/A6.62-
Revenue4.7M40.7B0%
Total Cash178M2.92B6%
Total Debt79.5M16.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PALAF vs VALE: Fundamental Ratings
PALAF
VALE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5865
SMR RATING
1..100
9040
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9479
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9291
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VALE's Valuation (7) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for PALAF (82) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew significantly faster than PALAF’s over the last 12 months.

PALAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (65) in the Steel industry. This means that PALAF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's SMR Rating (40) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PALAF (90) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than PALAF’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's Price Growth Rating (79) in the Steel industry is in the same range as PALAF (94) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew similarly to PALAF’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Steel industry is in the same range as PALAF (92) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew similarly to PALAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PALAFVALE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PALAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VALE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRCR0.200.04
+24.25%
Dear Cashmere Holding Co.
ACLLY57.011.50
+2.69%
ACCELLERON INDS LTD.
NGLOY14.400.16
+1.12%
Anglo American plc
MITEY13.38-0.12
-0.89%
Mitsubishi Estate Co. Ltd.
NGENF1.46-0.09
-5.81%
NervGen Pharma Corp.

PALAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PALAF has been closely correlated with LNDLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PALAF jumps, then LNDLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PALAF
1D Price
Change %
PALAF100%
-0.41%
LNDLF - PALAF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
AUMC - PALAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALE - PALAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
CAMZF - PALAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-12.81%
PLLTL - PALAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-10.58%
More