Ad is loading...
PALC vs RECS
PALC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts PALC vs RECS
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Mlt Ftr Alt ETF
Price$45.74
Change+$2.29 (+5.27%)
Volume$27.35K
Net Assets280.56M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$32.12
Change+$2.72 (+9.25%)
Volume$1.07M
Net Assets2.04B
PALC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PALC vs. RECS commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALC is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.04B vs. PALC (281M). PALC (-6.990) and RECS (-7.221) have matching annual dividend yield . PALC was incepted earlier than RECS: PALC (5 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than PALC (0.60). PALC has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| PALC | RECS | PALC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -6.990 | -7.221 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 281M | 2.04B | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 417.00 | 49.00 | 851% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.73 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PALC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PALC has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PALC jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALC | 100% | +5.27% | ||
| KKR - PALC | 73% Closely correlated | +16.88% | ||
| APO - PALC | 73% Closely correlated | +16.34% | ||
| JCI - PALC | 72% Closely correlated | +10.81% | ||
| MS - PALC | 72% Closely correlated | +11.35% | ||
| AMP - PALC | 69% Closely correlated | +11.03% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +9.25% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +11.98% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +14.25% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +10.13% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +11.30% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +13.58% | ||
More | ||||