Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
PALC vs RECS
PALC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts PALC vs RECS
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Mlt Ftr Alt ETF
Price$52.34
Change+$0.38 (+0.73%)
Volume$1.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.59
Change+$0.06 (+0.17%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
PALC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PALC vs. RECS commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALC is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.39B vs. PALC (371M). RECS (28.221) and PALC (27.500) have matching annual dividend yield . PALC was incepted earlier than RECS: PALC (4 years) vs RECS (5 years). PALC has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| PALC | RECS | PALC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 27.500 | 28.221 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 371M | 1.39B | 27% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 629.00 | 45.00 | 1,398% |
| Yield | 0.67 | 0.89 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PALC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PALC has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PALC jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALC | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| CDNS - PALC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| SNPS - PALC | 68% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| LRCX - PALC | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.40% | ||
| KLAC - PALC | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| AMAT - PALC | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.40% | ||
More | ||||