Ad is loading...
PALC vs RECS
PALC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts PALC vs RECS
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Mlt Ftr Alt ETF
Price$47.31
Change-$0.15 (-0.32%)
Volume$303
Net Assets292.03M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$34.84
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.5K
Net Assets2.71B
PALC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PALC vs. RECS commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALC is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.71B vs. PALC (292M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than PALC: RECS (0.462) vs PALC (-3.488). PALC was incepted earlier than RECS: PALC (5 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than PALC (0.60). PALC has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| PALC | RECS | PALC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -3.488 | 0.462 | -755% |
| Net Assets | 292M | 2.71B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 417.00 | 49.00 | 851% |
| Yield | 0.95 | 0.73 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PALC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PALC has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PALC jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALC | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| MS - PALC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| KKR - PALC | 74% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| JCI - PALC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| APO - PALC | 73% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| AMP - PALC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||