PALC vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALC is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PALC | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 89% | 20 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GURCX | 32.04 | 0.50 | +1.59% |
| NAA Risk Managed Real Estate C | |||
| PRKQX | 7.38 | 0.10 | +1.37% |
| PGIM Real Estate Income R6 | |||
| PAWAX | 70.98 | 0.65 | +0.92% |
| T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-Adv | |||
| FRBCX | 26.80 | -1.81 | -6.32% |
| JHancock Regional Bank C | |||
| RLITX | 13.50 | -1.58 | -10.49% |
| Lazard International Strategic Eq R6 | |||
PALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PALC has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PALC jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALC | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| CDNS - PALC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| SNPS - PALC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| LRCX - PALC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| KLAC - PALC | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| AMAT - PALC | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 85% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| RIOT - SNPS | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
More | ||||