PAX
Price
$12.86
Change
+$0.21 (+1.66%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.2B
70 days until earnings call
VRTS
Price
$170.97
Change
+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Updated
May 22, 01:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.71B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAX vs VRTS

Header iconPAX vs VRTS Comparison
Open Charts PAX vs VRTSBanner chart's image
Patria Investments
Price$12.86
Change+$0.21 (+1.66%)
Volume$62.02K
Capitalization2.2B
Virtus Investment Partners
Price$170.97
Change+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Volume$962
Capitalization1.71B
PAX vs VRTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAX vs. VRTS commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAX is a Buy and VRTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (PAX: $12.65 vs. VRTS: $170.93)
Brand notoriety: PAX and VRTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAX: 126% vs. VRTS: 63%
Market capitalization -- PAX: $2.2B vs. VRTS: $1.71B
PAX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.2B. VRTS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the long-term than VRTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VRTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRTS is a better buy in the short-term than PAX.

Price Growth

PAX (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.20% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

VRTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAX($2.2B) has a higher market cap than VRTS($1.72B). PAX has higher P/E ratio than VRTS: PAX (18.37) vs VRTS (13.66). PAX YTD gains are higher at: 11.512 vs. VRTS (-20.517). VRTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 434M vs. PAX (143M). VRTS has more cash in the bank: 340M vs. PAX (12.8M). PAX has less debt than VRTS: PAX (15.6M) vs VRTS (2.18B). VRTS has higher revenues than PAX: VRTS (841M) vs PAX (307M).
PAXVRTSPAX / VRTS
Capitalization2.2B1.72B128%
EBITDA143M434M33%
Gain YTD11.512-20.517-56%
P/E Ratio18.3713.66134%
Revenue307M841M37%
Total Cash12.8M340M4%
Total Debt15.6M2.18B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VRTS: Fundamental Ratings
VRTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAXVRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APGCX59.80N/A
N/A
AB Large Cap Growth C
FTVFX33.35N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value M
TRRSX19.03N/A
N/A
Nuveen Real Estate Sec Sel Retire
SUFCX38.35N/A
N/A
NAA Mid Growth C
MRRFX16.48-0.36
-2.14%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value R

VRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRTS
1D Price
Change %
VRTS100%
-3.20%
IVZ - VRTS
76%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
APAM - VRTS
75%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
JHG - VRTS
73%
Closely correlated
-4.02%
TROW - VRTS
73%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
AMG - VRTS
72%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
More