Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PBDAX vs RCBAX
PBDAX vs RCBAX Comparison
Open Charts PBDAX vs RCBAX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond A
Price$8.97
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.15B
American Funds Corporate Bond R1
Price$9.40
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
PBDAX vs RCBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PBDAX vs. RCBAX commentary
Jun 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBDAX is a Hold and RCBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDAX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RCBAX (1.93B). PBDAX pays higher dividends than RCBAX: PBDAX (4.15) vs RCBAX (3.51). PBDAX was incepted earlier than RCBAX: PBDAX (21 years) vs RCBAX (9 years). PBDAX (1.49) and RCBAX (1.42) have similar cost to investors . RCBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. PBDAX (150.00). RCBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDAX: RCBAX (250) vs PBDAX (1000). PBDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.39 vs. RCBAX (3.60). PBDAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.62 vs. RCBAX (-10.27).
| PBDAX | RCBAX | PBDAX / RCBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.41 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.42 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.382 | 1.759 | 135% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.93B | 628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.15 | 3.51 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | 3.60 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.32 | 6.35 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.62 | -10.27 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement