Ad is loading...
PBDAX vs RCBGX
PBDAX vs RCBGX Comparison
Open Charts PBDAX vs RCBGX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond A
Price$9.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.6B
American Funds Corporate Bond R2E
Price$9.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
PBDAX vs RCBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PBDAX vs. RCBGX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBDAX is a Hold and RCBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDAX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. RCBGX (1.95B). PBDAX pays higher dividends than RCBGX: PBDAX (4.04) vs RCBGX (3.69). PBDAX was incepted earlier than RCBGX: PBDAX (21 years) vs RCBGX (9 years). PBDAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RCBGX (1.12). RCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. PBDAX (150.00). RCBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDAX: RCBGX (250) vs PBDAX (1000). PBDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.87 vs. RCBGX (6.39). PBDAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.26 vs. RCBGX (-6.87).
| PBDAX | RCBGX | PBDAX / RCBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.11 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.12 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.413 | 2.047 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 1.95B | 645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.04 | 3.69 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 6.39 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.88 | 5.55 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.26 | -6.87 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers