Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PBFCX vs PNYPX
PBFCX vs PNYPX Comparison
Open Charts PBFCX vs PNYPX
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets877.99M
PIMCO NY Municipal I2
Price$10.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets877.99M
PBFCX vs PNYPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PBFCX vs. PNYPX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBFCX is a Hold and PNYPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX (878M) and PNYPX (878M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PNYPX pays higher dividends than PBFCX: PNYPX (3.57) vs PBFCX (2.56). PBFCX was incepted earlier than PNYPX: PBFCX (16 years) vs PNYPX (15 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than PNYPX (0.55). PBFCX (18.00) and PNYPX (18.00) have comparable annual turnover. PBFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNYPX: PBFCX (1000) vs PNYPX (1000000). PNYPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.00 vs. PBFCX (-0.98). PNYPX return over 5 years is better than : 1.29 vs. PBFCX (-2.69).
| PBFCX | PNYPX | PBFCX / PNYPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.55 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.55 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.951 | -1.473 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 878M | 878M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 3.57 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.98 | -0.00 | 21,563% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.39 | 7.01 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.69 | 1.29 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.85 | 19.54 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement