Ad is loading...
PBFCX vs PNYPX
PBFCX vs PNYPX Comparison
Open Charts PBFCX vs PNYPX
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets874.13M
PIMCO NY Municipal I2
Price$10.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets874.13M
PBFCX vs PNYPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PBFCX vs. PNYPX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBFCX is a Hold and PNYPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX (874M) and PNYPX (874M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PNYPX pays higher dividends than PBFCX: PNYPX (3.54) vs PBFCX (2.54). PBFCX was incepted earlier than PNYPX: PBFCX (16 years) vs PNYPX (14 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than PNYPX (0.55). PBFCX (18.00) and PNYPX (18.00) have comparable annual turnover. PBFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNYPX: PBFCX (1000) vs PNYPX (1000000). PNYPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.36 vs. PBFCX (-0.62). PNYPX return over 5 years is better than : 3.62 vs. PBFCX (-0.45).
| PBFCX | PNYPX | PBFCX / PNYPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.55 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.55 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.964 | -2.731 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 874M | 874M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.54 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.62 | 0.36 | -172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.27 | 4.61 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.45 | 3.62 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.28 | 16.47 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers