Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PBFCX vs PNYPX
PBFCX vs PNYPX Comparison
Open Charts PBFCX vs PNYPX
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets854.61M
PIMCO NY Municipal I2
Price$10.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets854.61M
PBFCX vs PNYPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PBFCX vs. PNYPX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBFCX is a Hold and PNYPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX (855M) and PNYPX (855M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PNYPX pays higher dividends than PBFCX: PNYPX (3.59) vs PBFCX (2.58). PBFCX was incepted earlier than PNYPX: PBFCX (16 years) vs PNYPX (15 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than PNYPX (0.55). PBFCX (14.00) and PNYPX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. PBFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNYPX: PBFCX (1000) vs PNYPX (1000000). PNYPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. PBFCX (-2.52). PNYPX return over 5 years is better than : -0.50 vs. PBFCX (-4.41).
| PBFCX | PNYPX | PBFCX / PNYPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.55 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.55 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.019 | -1.458 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 855M | 855M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 3.59 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.52 | -1.56 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.29 | 4.95 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.41 | -0.50 | 883% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.78 | 19.55 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement