PBHC
Price
$16.48
Change
+$0.18 (+1.10%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
75.52M
11 days until earnings call
PROV
Price
$14.87
Change
+$0.17 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
92.68M
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PBHC vs PROV

Header iconPBHC vs PROV Comparison
Open Charts PBHC vs PROVBanner chart's image
Pathfinder Ban
Price$16.48
Change+$0.18 (+1.10%)
Volume$1.78K
Capitalization75.52M
Provident Financial Holdings
Price$14.87
Change+$0.17 (+1.16%)
Volume$4.51K
Capitalization92.68M
PBHC vs PROV Comparison Chart
Loading...
PBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBHC vs. PROV commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBHC is a Hold and PROV is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (PBHC: $16.48 vs. PROV: $14.87)
Brand notoriety: PBHC and PROV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBHC: 28% vs. PROV: 55%
Market capitalization -- PBHC: $75.52M vs. PROV: $92.68M
PBHC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $75.52M. PROV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $92.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePROV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PROV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PBHC and PROV are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBHC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBHC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PROV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PROV is a better buy in the short-term than PBHC.

Price Growth

PBHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.62% price change this week, while PROV (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBHC is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

PROV is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PROV($92.7M) has a higher market cap than PBHC($75.5M). PROV has higher P/E ratio than PBHC: PROV (12.10) vs PBHC (7.85). PBHC YTD gains are higher at: -5.247 vs. PROV (-6.537). PBHC has less debt than PROV: PBHC (212M) vs PROV (242M). PBHC has higher revenues than PROV: PBHC (43.1M) vs PROV (40.3M).
PBHCPROVPBHC / PROV
Capitalization75.5M92.7M81%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.247-6.53780%
P/E Ratio7.8512.1065%
Revenue43.1M40.3M107%
Total Cash22.5MN/A-
Total Debt212M242M88%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBHC vs PROV: Fundamental Ratings
PBHC
PROV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5052
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
7261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
236
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PROV's Valuation (31) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PBHC (50). This means that PROV’s stock grew similarly to PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PROV (100). This means that PBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PROV’s over the last 12 months.

PROV's SMR Rating (61) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PBHC (72). This means that PROV’s stock grew similarly to PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PROV (53). This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to PROV’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PROV (36). This means that PBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PROV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBHCPROV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
51%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYWVX59.650.92
+1.57%
Rydex Emerging Markets 2X Strategy H
OTCYX101.381.42
+1.42%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap Y
TRGAX20.840.24
+1.17%
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials I
MCGCX18.660.14
+0.76%
BlackRock Advantage Global Investor C
JCSCX21.480.11
+0.51%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value C

PBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBHC and ANDC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBHC and ANDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBHC
1D Price
Change %
PBHC100%
+1.73%
ANDC - PBHC
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
PROV - PBHC
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
BAFN - PBHC
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
UBFO - PBHC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
BOTJ - PBHC
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
More

PROV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PROV has been loosely correlated with MNSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PROV jumps, then MNSB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROV
1D Price
Change %
PROV100%
+1.16%
MNSB - PROV
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
FFIC - PROV
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
RNST - PROV
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
FUNC - PROV
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
LKFN - PROV
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More