Ad is loading...
PBRCX vs PSSCX
PBRCX vs PSSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PBRCX vs. PSSCX commentary
Apr 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBRCX is a Hold and PSSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBRCX has more cash in the bank: 140M vs. PSSCX (85.8M). PBRCX pays higher dividends than PSSCX: PBRCX (10.63) vs PSSCX (0.00). PBRCX was incepted earlier than PSSCX: PBRCX (26 years) vs PSSCX (19 years). PBRCX (3.47) is less costly to investors than PSSCX (1.91). PSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 317.00 vs. PBRCX (140.00). PSSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBRCX: PSSCX (1000) vs PBRCX (1500). PSSCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to PBRCX: PSSCX (1000) vs PBRCX (250). PSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.49 vs. PBRCX (0.33). PSSCX return over 5 years is better than : -44.71 vs. PBRCX (-52.39).
| PBRCX | PSSCX | PBRCX / PSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.36 | 1.91 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.47 | 1.91 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.684 | 8.772 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 140M | 85.8M | 163% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 10.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.33 | 1.49 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.39 | -9.82 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -52.39 | -44.71 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | -72.54 | -64.71 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...