Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBAX vs RDMCX
PCBAX vs RDMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBAX vs. RDMCX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBAX is a Buy and RDMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBAX has more cash in the bank: 3.02B vs. RDMCX (41.4M). RDMCX pays higher dividends than PCBAX: RDMCX (3.93) vs PCBAX (0.00). PCBAX was incepted earlier than RDMCX: PCBAX (36 years) vs RDMCX (9 years). RDMCX (3.14) is less costly to investors than PCBAX (1.09). PCBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. RDMCX (0.00). PCBAX (1000) and RDMCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. RDMCX (-10.76). PCBAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.88 vs. RDMCX (-1.52).
| PCBAX | RDMCX | PCBAX / RDMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 3.01 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 3.14 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.873 | -7.628 | -38% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 41.4M | 7,285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | -10.76 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.61 | -23.03 | -98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.88 | -1.52 | -1,638% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers