Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCCLX vs RDGTX
PCCLX vs RDGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCCLX vs. RDGTX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCLX is a Hold and RDGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.9B vs. PCCLX (39.4M). PCCLX pays higher dividends than RDGTX: PCCLX (4.89) vs RDGTX (1.14). PCCLX was incepted earlier than RDGTX: PCCLX (5 years) vs RDGTX (18 years). PCCLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RDGTX (0.70). PCCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RDGTX (6.00). PCCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDGTX: PCCLX (0) vs RDGTX (250). RDGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. PCCLX (6.98).
| PCCLX | RDGTX | PCCLX / RDGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.70 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.70 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.852 | 10.550 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.4M | 47.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 1.14 | 430% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 10.07 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.39 | 40.06 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 41.88 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement