Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCCLX vs RFGTX
PCCLX vs RFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCCLX vs. RFGTX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCLX is a Hold and RFGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFGTX has more cash in the bank: 48B vs. PCCLX (39.6M). PCCLX pays higher dividends than RFGTX: PCCLX (4.89) vs RFGTX (1.44). PCCLX was incepted earlier than RFGTX: PCCLX (5 years) vs RFGTX (16 years). PCCLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RFGTX (0.36). PCCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RFGTX (6.00). PCCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFGTX: PCCLX (0) vs RFGTX (250). RFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. PCCLX (7.65).
| PCCLX | RFGTX | PCCLX / RFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.36 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.36 | 608% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.852 | 10.944 | 63% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6M | 48B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 1.44 | 340% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 11.43 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.39 | 41.38 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 43.77 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement