Ad is loading...
PCFCX vs SRCMX
PCFCX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts PCFCX vs SRCMX
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd C
Price$9.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.85M
Principal California Municipal A
Price$9.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets613.54M
PCFCX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCFCX vs. SRCMX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCFCX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRCMX has more cash in the bank: 614M vs. PCFCX (198M). SRCMX pays higher dividends than PCFCX: SRCMX (3.25) vs PCFCX (2.38). PCFCX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: PCFCX (16 years) vs SRCMX (36 years). PCFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than SRCMX (0.87). SRCMX (35.90) and PCFCX (35.00) have comparable annual turnover. PCFCX (1000) and SRCMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SRCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. PCFCX (1.16). SRCMX return over 5 years is better than : 3.84 vs. PCFCX (0.17).
| PCFCX | SRCMX | PCFCX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.87 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.87 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.630 | -1.160 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 614M | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 3.25 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.16 | 1.54 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.82 | 4.54 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.17 | 3.84 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.10 | 19.10 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...