Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCFCX vs SWCAX
PCFCX vs SWCAX Comparison
Open Charts PCFCX vs SWCAX
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd C
Price$9.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.44M
Schwab CA Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets461.06M
PCFCX vs SWCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCFCX vs. SWCAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCFCX is a Hold and SWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWCAX has more cash in the bank: 461M vs. PCFCX (204M). SWCAX pays higher dividends than PCFCX: SWCAX (3.25) vs PCFCX (2.40). PCFCX was incepted earlier than SWCAX: PCFCX (16 years) vs SWCAX (33 years). PCFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than SWCAX (0.41). SWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PCFCX (35.00). SWCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCFCX: SWCAX (0) vs PCFCX (1000). SWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.44 vs. PCFCX (-0.02). SWCAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.45 vs. PCFCX (-2.92).
| PCFCX | SWCAX | PCFCX / SWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.38 | 401% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.41 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.856 | -1.109 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204M | 461M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 3.25 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.02 | 0.44 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.72 | 7.64 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.92 | -0.45 | 656% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.51 | 12.25 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers