Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCFCX vs SWCAX
PCFCX vs SWCAX Comparison
Open Charts PCFCX vs SWCAX
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd C
Price$9.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.96M
Schwab CA Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets464.42M
PCFCX vs SWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCFCX vs. SWCAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCFCX is a Hold and SWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWCAX has more cash in the bank: 464M vs. PCFCX (206M). SWCAX pays higher dividends than PCFCX: SWCAX (3.25) vs PCFCX (2.39). PCFCX was incepted earlier than SWCAX: PCFCX (16 years) vs SWCAX (33 years). PCFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than SWCAX (0.41). SWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PCFCX (35.00). SWCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCFCX: SWCAX (0) vs PCFCX (1000). SWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.10 vs. PCFCX (0.96). SWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.03 vs. PCFCX (-2.39).
| PCFCX | SWCAX | PCFCX / SWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.38 | 401% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.41 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.117 | -0.478 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 464M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 3.25 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.96 | 1.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.46 | 6.97 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.39 | 0.03 | -7,277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.19 | 12.78 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers