Ad is loading...
PCLPX vs RYMBX
PCLPX vs RYMBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLPX vs RYMBX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I2
Price$6.22
Change+$0.10 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.17B
Rydex Commodities Strategy H
Price$144.81
Change+$2.30 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.36M
PCLPX vs RYMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLPX vs. RYMBX commentary
May 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLPX is a Hold and RYMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.17B vs. RYMBX (4.36M). PCLPX pays higher dividends than RYMBX: PCLPX (8.94) vs RYMBX (0.00). PCLPX was incepted earlier than RYMBX: PCLPX (15 years) vs RYMBX (20 years). RYMBX (1.80) is less costly to investors than PCLPX (1.10). RYMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLPX: RYMBX (2500) vs PCLPX (1000000). PCLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.49 vs. RYMBX (-5.10). PCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 174.73 vs. RYMBX (-1.00).
| PCLPX | RYMBX | PCLPX / RYMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.61 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.80 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.431 | -4.436 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.17B | 4.36M | 95,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.49 | -5.10 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.23 | -28.82 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 174.73 | -1.00 | -17,534% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.28 | -69.92 | -83% |