Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCMBX vs SWCAX
PCMBX vs SWCAX Comparison
Open Charts PCMBX vs SWCAX
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd A
Price$9.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.96M
Schwab CA Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets464.65M
PCMBX vs SWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCMBX vs. SWCAX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCMBX is a Hold and SWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWCAX has more cash in the bank: 465M vs. PCMBX (206M). SWCAX (3.25) and PCMBX (3.15) have matching dividends . PCMBX was incepted earlier than SWCAX: PCMBX (26 years) vs SWCAX (33 years). PCMBX (0.78) is less costly to investors than SWCAX (0.41). SWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PCMBX (35.00). SWCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCMBX: SWCAX (0) vs PCMBX (1000). PCMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.51 vs. SWCAX (1.01). PCMBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.68 vs. SWCAX (-0.05).
| PCMBX | SWCAX | PCMBX / SWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.38 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.41 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.256 | -0.478 | -53% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 465M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 3.25 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.51 | 1.01 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.91 | 6.39 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.68 | -0.05 | -1,369% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.59 | 12.78 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers