Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCNNX vs RCBAX
PCNNX vs RCBAX Comparison
Open Charts PCNNX vs RCBAX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$8.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.15B
American Funds Corporate Bond R1
Price$9.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
PCNNX vs RCBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCNNX vs. RCBAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCNNX is a Hold and RCBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RCBAX (1.94B). PCNNX pays higher dividends than RCBAX: PCNNX (4.40) vs RCBAX (3.51). PCNNX was incepted earlier than RCBAX: PCNNX (7 years) vs RCBAX (9 years). RCBAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than PCNNX (1.29). RCBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. PCNNX (150.00). RCBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: RCBAX (250) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.53 vs. RCBAX (2.62). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.40 vs. RCBAX (-10.27).
| PCNNX | RCBAX | PCNNX / RCBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.41 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.42 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.291 | 1.759 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.94B | 624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.40 | 3.51 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 2.62 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.13 | 8.96 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.40 | -10.27 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement