Ad is loading...
PCNNX vs RCBGX
PCNNX vs RCBGX Comparison
Open Charts PCNNX vs RCBGX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.02
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.6B
American Funds Corporate Bond R2E
Price$9.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
PCNNX vs RCBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCNNX vs. RCBGX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCNNX is a Hold and RCBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. RCBGX (1.95B). PCNNX pays higher dividends than RCBGX: PCNNX (4.28) vs RCBGX (3.69). PCNNX was incepted earlier than RCBGX: PCNNX (7 years) vs RCBGX (9 years). PCNNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RCBGX (1.12). RCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. PCNNX (150.00). RCBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: RCBGX (250) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. RCBGX (6.39). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : 2.52 vs. RCBGX (-6.87).
| PCNNX | RCBGX | PCNNX / RCBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.11 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.12 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.476 | 2.047 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 1.95B | 645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.28 | 3.69 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 6.39 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.68 | 5.55 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.52 | -6.87 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...