Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCNNX vs RCBGX
PCNNX vs RCBGX Comparison
Open Charts PCNNX vs RCBGX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$8.98
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.39B
American Funds Corporate Bond R2E
Price$9.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
PCNNX vs RCBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCNNX vs. RCBGX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCNNX is a Hold and RCBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. RCBGX (1.92B). PCNNX pays higher dividends than RCBGX: PCNNX (4.39) vs RCBGX (3.46). PCNNX was incepted earlier than RCBGX: PCNNX (7 years) vs RCBGX (9 years). PCNNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RCBGX (1.12). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. RCBGX (191.00). RCBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: RCBGX (250) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. RCBGX (2.11). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : -1.93 vs. RCBGX (-11.52).
| PCNNX | RCBGX | PCNNX / RCBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.11 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.12 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.098 | 1.642 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.92B | 644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.39 | 3.46 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 2.11 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.50 | 6.52 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.93 | -11.52 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement