PCRCF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.05 (-35.71%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SMRVF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

PCRCF vs SMRVF

Header iconPCRCF vs SMRVF Comparison
Open Charts PCRCF vs SMRVFBanner chart's image
BOLT METALS
Price$0.09
Change-$0.05 (-35.71%)
Volume$43.97K
CapitalizationN/A
Smooth Rock Ventures
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
PCRCF vs SMRVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PCRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCRCF vs. SMRVF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCRCF is a Hold and SMRVF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (PCRCF: $0.09 vs. SMRVF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PCRCF and SMRVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCRCF: 369% vs. SMRVF: 7%
Market capitalization -- PCRCF: $440.75K vs. SMRVF: $2.31M
PCRCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $440.75K. SMRVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCRCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMRVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PCRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMRVF is a better buy in the long-term than PCRCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCRCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMRVF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCRCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SMRVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMRVF is a better buy in the short-term than PCRCF.

Price Growth

PCRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -45.88% price change this week, while SMRVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRVF($2.31M) has a higher market cap than PCRCF($441K). SMRVF YTD gains are higher at: -23.174 vs. PCRCF (-40.124).
PCRCFSMRVFPCRCF / SMRVF
Capitalization441K2.31M19%
EBITDAN/A-220.05K-
Gain YTD-40.124-23.174173%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A721K-
Total DebtN/A237K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCRCF vs SMRVF: Fundamental Ratings
PCRCF
SMRVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7626
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1330

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMRVF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCRCF (93). This means that SMRVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCRCF’s over the last 12 months.

SMRVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PCRCF (100). This means that SMRVF’s stock grew similarly to PCRCF’s over the last 12 months.

SMRVF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PCRCF (100). This means that SMRVF’s stock grew similarly to PCRCF’s over the last 12 months.

PCRCF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SMRVF (63). This means that PCRCF’s stock grew similarly to SMRVF’s over the last 12 months.

PCRCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMRVF (100). This means that PCRCF’s stock grew similarly to SMRVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCRCFSMRVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PCRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEAGX48.19N/A
N/A
Needham Aggressive Growth Retail
TBHDX5.47-0.03
-0.55%
Tweedy, Browne Worldwide Hi Div Yld Val
MVCAX31.32-0.33
-1.04%
MFS Mid Cap Value A
LADVX31.23-0.41
-1.30%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R6
ECOAX8.88-0.14
-1.55%
Ecofin Global Renewables Infras A

PCRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCRCF and KGLLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCRCF and KGLLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCRCF
1D Price
Change %
PCRCF100%
-31.85%
KGLLF - PCRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDMCF - PCRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AWLIF - PCRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.64%
CRECF - PCRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
VULNF - PCRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-19.24%
More

SMRVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMRVF and GTMLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMRVF and GTMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMRVF
1D Price
Change %
SMRVF100%
N/A
GTMLF - SMRVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASMMF - SMRVF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
PCRCF - SMRVF
9%
Poorly correlated
-31.85%
AAGFF - SMRVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-12.47%
BSENF - SMRVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-10.90%
More