Ad is loading...
PCVAX vs SSGSX
PCVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PCVAX vs SSGSX
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value A
Price$10.49
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.71M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.43
Change-$0.26 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
PCVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCVAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. PCVAX (247M). PCVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PCVAX (1.38) vs SSGSX (0.52). PCVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PCVAX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and PCVAX (1.23) have similar cost to investors . PCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX (6%) and PCVAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PCVAX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.45 vs. SSGSX (-12.70). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 25.11 vs. PCVAX (12.81).
| PCVAX | SSGSX | PCVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.26 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.364 | -12.923 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 5.38B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.52 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.45 | -12.70 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.72 | -13.46 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | 25.11 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -56.55 | 3.15 | -1,797% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...