Ad is loading...
PCVCX vs SSGSX
PCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PCVCX vs SSGSX
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value C
Price$8.12
Change+$0.10 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.22M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$39.06
Change+$0.45 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.17B
PCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCVCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.17B vs. PCVCX (232M). PCVCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PCVCX (0.67) vs SSGSX (0.52). PCVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PCVCX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PCVCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). PCVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PCVCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.54 vs. SSGSX (-18.12). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 13.51 vs. PCVCX (-10.01).
| PCVCX | SSGSX | PCVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.26 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.163 | -16.843 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 5.17B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.52 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.54 | -18.12 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.88 | -17.94 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.01 | 13.51 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -65.46 | -1.50 | 4,372% |