Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCVCX vs SSGSX
PCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PCVCX vs SSGSX
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value C
Price$9.37
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.19 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
PCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCVCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. PCVCX (258M). PCVCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PCVCX (0.66) vs SSGSX (0.51). PCVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PCVCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PCVCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). PCVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PCVCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.49 vs. SSGSX (-11.73). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.18 vs. PCVCX (-0.53).
| PCVCX | SSGSX | PCVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.26 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.796 | -4.652 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258M | 5.64B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.51 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.49 | -11.73 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.25 | 0.50 | -2,822% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.53 | 21.18 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -58.53 | 13.53 | -432% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement