Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBSX vs WTIBX
PDBSX vs WTIBX Comparison
Open Charts PDBSX vs WTIBX
PGIM Total Return Bond R4
Price$11.90
Change-$0.04 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.81B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Ret
Price$9.34
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets706.66M
PDBSX vs WTIBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBSX vs. WTIBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBSX is a Hold and WTIBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBSX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. WTIBX (707M). PDBSX pays higher dividends than WTIBX: PDBSX (4.51) vs WTIBX (4.08). PDBSX was incepted earlier than WTIBX: PDBSX (7 years) vs WTIBX (37 years). WTIBX (0.69) and PDBSX (0.68) have similar cost to investors . PDBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. WTIBX (36.00). PDBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTIBX: PDBSX (0) vs WTIBX (2500). PDBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.69 vs. WTIBX (4.12). WTIBX return over 5 years is better than : -1.30 vs. PDBSX (-1.48).
| PDBSX | WTIBX | PDBSX / WTIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.55 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.69 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.734 | 2.836 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.8B | 707M | 6,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.51 | 4.08 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | 4.12 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.26 | 12.23 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.48 | -1.30 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement