PDER
Price
$290.00
Change
-$8.54 (-2.86%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
188.77M
PLSDF
Price
$2.87
Change
+$0.08 (+2.87%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
143.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PDER vs PLSDF

Header iconPDER vs PLSDF Comparison
Open Charts PDER vs PLSDFBanner chart's image
Pardee Resources
Price$290.00
Change-$8.54 (-2.86%)
Volume$5
Capitalization188.77M
Pulse Seismic
Price$2.87
Change+$0.08 (+2.87%)
Volume$11.9K
Capitalization143.49M
PDER vs PLSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PDER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PDER vs. PLSDF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDER is a Buy and PLSDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PDER: $290.00 vs. PLSDF: $2.87)
Brand notoriety: PDER and PLSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PDER: 3% vs. PLSDF: 49%
Market capitalization -- PDER: $188.77M vs. PLSDF: $143.49M
PDER [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $188.77M. PLSDF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $143.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $52.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PDER’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLSDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PDER’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the long-term than PDER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PDER’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLSDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PDER’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PLSDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PDER is a better buy in the short-term than PLSDF.

Price Growth

PDER (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while PLSDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.50% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDER($189M) has a higher market cap than PLSDF($143M). PLSDF YTD gains are higher at: 72.892 vs. PDER (-6.552).
PDERPLSDFPDER / PLSDF
Capitalization189M143M132%
EBITDAN/A40.5M-
Gain YTD-6.55272.892-9%
P/E RatioN/A9.02-
RevenueN/A49.4M-
Total CashN/A25.9M-
Total DebtN/A212K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDER vs PLSDF: Fundamental Ratings
PDER
PLSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3086
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10023
SMR RATING
1..100
10015
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10069
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PDER's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (47). This means that PDER’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDER (100). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PDER’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDER (100). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PDER’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PDER (59). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to PDER’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as PDER (100). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to PDER’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PDERPLSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PDER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAPPF0.100.01
+7.89%
PROSTAR HLDGS INC.
ASMLF761.563.59
+0.47%
ASML Holding N.V.
FOTB149.250.65
+0.44%
First Ottawa Bancshares
HCTPF0.17N/A
N/A
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust
SHPMF1.53N/A
N/A
Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holdings Co., Ltd.

PDER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PDER and HGHAF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDER and HGHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDER
1D Price
Change %
PDER100%
-2.86%
HGHAF - PDER
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLSDF - PDER
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
QSEP - PDER
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
POFCY - PDER
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNTIF - PDER
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSDF and QSEP have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSDF and QSEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSDF
1D Price
Change %
PLSDF100%
+2.94%
QSEP - PLSDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
MCCRF - PLSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
PDER - PLSDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
PSYTF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
POFCF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More