PDNLA
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Mar 26 closing price
RFNDF
Price
$1.11
Change
+$0.15 (+15.63%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

PDNLA vs RFNDF

Header iconPDNLA vs RFNDF Comparison
Open Charts PDNLA vs RFNDFBanner chart's image
Presidential Realty
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$134
CapitalizationN/A
Rural Funds Group Stapled Securities
Price$1.11
Change+$0.15 (+15.63%)
Volume$12.97K
CapitalizationN/A
PDNLA vs RFNDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RFNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PDNLA vs. RFNDF commentary
Dec 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDNLA is a Hold and RFNDF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 21, 2024
Stock price -- (PDNLA: $0.03 vs. RFNDF: $1.11)
Brand notoriety: PDNLA and RFNDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PDNLA: 100% vs. RFNDF: 160%
Market capitalization -- PDNLA: $67.13K vs. RFNDF: $1.54B
PDNLA [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $67.13K. RFNDF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PDNLA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRFNDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PDNLA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RFNDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RFNDF is a better buy in the long-term than PDNLA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RFNDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RFNDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PDNLA (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RFNDF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +16.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.28% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFNDF($1.54B) has a higher market cap than PDNLA($67.1K). PDNLA has higher P/E ratio than RFNDF: PDNLA (40.00) vs RFNDF (3.29). PDNLA YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. RFNDF (-22.917). RFNDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249M vs. PDNLA (173K). RFNDF has more cash in the bank: 15.8M vs. PDNLA (145K). PDNLA has less debt than RFNDF: PDNLA (1.44M) vs RFNDF (347M). RFNDF has higher revenues than PDNLA: RFNDF (87.1M) vs PDNLA (1.12M).
PDNLARFNDFPDNLA / RFNDF
Capitalization67.1K1.54B0%
EBITDA173K249M0%
Gain YTD0.000-22.917-
P/E Ratio40.003.291,216%
Revenue1.12M87.1M1%
Total Cash145K15.8M1%
Total Debt1.44M347M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDNLA vs RFNDF: Fundamental Ratings
PDNLA
RFNDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10078
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6981
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5456
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PDNLA's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (37). This means that PDNLA’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

PDNLA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (100). This means that PDNLA’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

RFNDF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as PDNLA (100). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to PDNLA’s over the last 12 months.

PDNLA's Price Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (81). This means that PDNLA’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

PDNLA's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (56). This means that PDNLA’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PDNLARFNDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RFNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUEVX36.14-0.03
-0.08%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R6
BPGSX11.17-0.01
-0.09%
Boston Partners Global Sustainablty Ins
LTFOX18.82-0.06
-0.32%
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
FSIRX8.30-0.03
-0.36%
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret I
IVGSX22.29-0.10
-0.45%
VY® Invesco Growth and Income S

PDNLA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PDNLA and ASPD have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDNLA and ASPD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDNLA
1D Price
Change %
PDNLA100%
N/A
ASPD - PDNLA
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APYRF - PDNLA
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
SEGXF - PDNLA
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
PAZRF - PDNLA
2%
Poorly correlated
-8.89%
RFNDF - PDNLA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RFNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RFNDF and PAZRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RFNDF and PAZRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RFNDF
1D Price
Change %
RFNDF100%
N/A
PAZRF - RFNDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-8.89%
EFRTF - RFNDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
SEGXF - RFNDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
PRKWF - RFNDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
RSHPF - RFNDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More