PEN vs SNN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEN is a Hold and SNN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PEN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNN’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SNN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PEN (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +8.56% price change this week, while SNN (@Medical Specialties) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
PEN is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
SNN is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (-1.75% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| PEN | SNN | PEN / SNN | |
| Capitalization | 8.64B | 10.9B | 79% |
| EBITDA | 109M | 956M | 11% |
| Gain YTD | 22.823 | 6.306 | 362% |
| P/E Ratio | 93.70 | 40.76 | 230% |
| Revenue | 1.06B | 5.55B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 289M | 302M | 96% |
| Total Debt | 234M | 3.08B | 8% |
PEN | SNN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNN's Valuation (4) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for PEN (100). This means that SNN’s stock grew significantly faster than PEN’s over the last 12 months.
PEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNN (100). This means that PEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNN’s over the last 12 months.
PEN's SMR Rating (85) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SNN (94). This means that PEN’s stock grew similarly to SNN’s over the last 12 months.
PEN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SNN (56). This means that PEN’s stock grew similarly to SNN’s over the last 12 months.
PEN's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNN (89). This means that PEN’s stock grew significantly faster than SNN’s over the last 12 months.
| PEN | SNN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 17 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FMNY | 26.74 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| First Trust New York High Inc Mncpl ETF | |||
| GSLC | 117.84 | -1.97 | -1.64% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF | |||
| JHML | 71.39 | -1.23 | -1.69% |
| JHancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | |||
| TPLC | 43.71 | -0.77 | -1.73% |
| Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF | |||
| XHS | 98.31 | -3.71 | -3.64% |
| SPDR® S&P Health Care Services ETF | |||
PEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEN has been loosely correlated with QDEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEN jumps, then QDEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEN | 100% | -3.77% | ||
| QDEL - PEN | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SNN - PEN | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ICCM - PEN | 31% Poorly correlated | -6.00% | ||
| BIO - PEN | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| NVST - PEN | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||
SNN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNN has been loosely correlated with TFX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNN jumps, then TFX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNN | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| TFX - SNN | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| IDXX - SNN | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ZBH - SNN | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| SONVY - SNN | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| SYK - SNN | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
More | ||||