PEXZF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
RMRDF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

PEXZF vs RMRDF

Header iconPEXZF vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts PEXZF vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Pacific Ridge Exploration
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.26
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$384.88K
CapitalizationN/A
PEXZF vs RMRDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PEXZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PEXZF vs. RMRDF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEXZF is a Buy and RMRDF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (PEXZF: $0.01 vs. RMRDF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: PEXZF and RMRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PEXZF: 1% vs. RMRDF: 145%
Market capitalization -- PEXZF: $13.05M vs. RMRDF: $46.12M
PEXZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.05M. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $46.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PEXZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PEXZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PEXZF and RMRDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PEXZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMRDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PEXZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PEXZF is a better buy in the short-term than RMRDF.

Price Growth

PEXZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -15.73% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +23.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMRDF($46.1M) has a higher market cap than PEXZF($13.1M). RMRDF YTD gains are higher at: 67.535 vs. PEXZF (-87.395). RMRDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.3M vs. PEXZF (-7.39M). PEXZF has more cash in the bank: 6.08M vs. RMRDF (1.8M). PEXZF (0) and RMRDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PEXZFRMRDFPEXZF / RMRDF
Capitalization13.1M46.1M28%
EBITDA-7.39M-2.3M321%
Gain YTD-87.39567.535-129%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.08M1.8M337%
Total Debt100KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PEXZF vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
PEXZF
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1424
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
9889
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
291
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4285

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEXZF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as RMRDF (95). This means that PEXZF’s stock grew similarly to RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEXZF (100). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEXZF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as PEXZF (98). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to PEXZF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEXZF (95). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEXZF’s over the last 12 months.

PEXZF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMRDF (91). This means that PEXZF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PEXZFRMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PEXZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TJX123.06-0.66
-0.53%
TJX Companies
TNET90.91-0.62
-0.68%
Trinet Group
VRTS233.56-4.49
-1.89%
Virtus Investment Partners
FFWM6.96-0.39
-5.31%
First Foundation
REE9.49-1.49
-13.57%
REE Automotive Ltd

PEXZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PEXZF and PAFRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PEXZF and PAFRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEXZF
1D Price
Change %
PEXZF100%
+2.04%
PAFRF - PEXZF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMRDF - PEXZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.24%
PNGZF - PEXZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMNF - PEXZF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCAUF - PEXZF
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.94%
More

RMRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMRDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMRDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMRDF
1D Price
Change %
RMRDF100%
+5.24%
NSUPF - RMRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
DCHRF - RMRDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
PAAS - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
CGLCF - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
More