Ad is loading...
PFFRX vs RFRAX
PFFRX vs RFRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRAX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.56B vs. RFRAX (727M). PFFRX (8.01) and RFRAX (7.75) have matching dividends . PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRAX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRAX (19 years). RFRAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). RFRAX (80.00) and PFFRX (78.50) have comparable annual turnover. RFRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRAX (2000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. RFRAX (5.51). PFFRX (41.14) and RFRAX (39.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFFRX | RFRAX | PFFRX / RFRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.01 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.03 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.049 | -0.317 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 5000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 727M | 628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.01 | 7.75 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 5.51 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.05 | 17.94 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.14 | 39.64 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.43 | 46.99 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...