Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFRX vs RSFLX
PFFRX vs RSFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RSFLX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RSFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. RSFLX (400M). RSFLX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: RSFLX (9.66) vs PFFRX (7.70). PFFRX was incepted earlier than RSFLX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RSFLX (15 years). RSFLX (1.12) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. RSFLX (52.00). PFFRX (2500) and RSFLX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RSFLX (7.55) and PFFRX (7.55) have marching annual gain over last year. PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.32 vs. RSFLX (28.52).
| PFFRX | RSFLX | PFFRX / RSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.00 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.12 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.259 | 1.805 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 400M | 1,195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.70 | 9.66 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.55 | 7.55 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.96 | 20.88 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.32 | 28.52 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.54 | 48.44 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement