Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFRX vs RSFLX
PFFRX vs RSFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RSFLX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RSFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.89B vs. RSFLX (405M). RSFLX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: RSFLX (9.59) vs PFFRX (7.61). PFFRX was incepted earlier than RSFLX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RSFLX (16 years). RSFLX (1.12) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. RSFLX (52.00). PFFRX (2500) and RSFLX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. PFFRX (7.92). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.97 vs. RSFLX (30.12).
| PFFRX | RSFLX | PFFRX / RSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.00 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.12 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.396 | 3.793 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 405M | 1,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.61 | 9.59 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.92 | 8.88 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.04 | 24.46 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.97 | 30.12 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.76 | 50.93 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement