Ad is loading...
PFFRX vs SAMBX
PFFRX vs SAMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. SAMBX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and SAMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.56B vs. SAMBX (1.34B). SAMBX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: SAMBX (9.45) vs PFFRX (8.01). PFFRX was incepted earlier than SAMBX: PFFRX (15 years) vs SAMBX (19 years). SAMBX (0.78) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). SAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. PFFRX (78.50). PFFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SAMBX: PFFRX (2500) vs SAMBX (100000). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.68 vs. SAMBX (6.24). SAMBX (41.41) and PFFRX (40.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFFRX | SAMBX | PFFRX / SAMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.64 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.78 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.049 | -0.953 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 1.34B | 340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.01 | 9.45 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.68 | 6.24 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.90 | 19.75 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.49 | 41.41 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.89 | 49.49 | 113% |