Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFRCX vs RCEBX
PFRCX vs RCEBX Comparison
Open Charts PFRCX vs RCEBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) C
Price$7.83
Change-$0.03 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets812.95M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2E
Price$16.30
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
PFRCX vs RCEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFRCX vs. RCEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFRCX is a Hold and RCEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEBX has more cash in the bank: 9.97B vs. PFRCX (813M). PFRCX pays higher dividends than RCEBX: PFRCX (3.02) vs RCEBX (2.77). PFRCX was incepted earlier than RCEBX: PFRCX (21 years) vs RCEBX (11 years). PFRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RCEBX (1.29). PFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 641.00 vs. RCEBX (251.00). RCEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFRCX: RCEBX (250) vs PFRCX (1000). PFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.55 vs. RCEBX (4.64). PFRCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.57 vs. RCEBX (-12.66).
| PFRCX | RCEBX | PFRCX / RCEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.29 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.29 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.100 | 5.469 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 9.97B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 2.77 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.55 | 4.64 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.89 | 1.63 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.57 | -12.66 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.55 | -1.52 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement