Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFRCX vs RCEBX
PFRCX vs RCEBX Comparison
Open Charts PFRCX vs RCEBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) C
Price$7.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.45M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2E
Price$16.29
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.03B
PFRCX vs RCEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFRCX vs. RCEBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFRCX is a Hold and RCEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEBX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFRCX (881M). RCEBX (2.97) and PFRCX (2.91) have matching dividends . PFRCX was incepted earlier than RCEBX: PFRCX (21 years) vs RCEBX (11 years). PFRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RCEBX (1.29). PFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 646.00 vs. RCEBX (251.00). RCEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFRCX: RCEBX (250) vs PFRCX (1000). PFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. RCEBX (4.48). PFRCX return over 5 years is better than : -11.60 vs. RCEBX (-13.60).
| PFRCX | RCEBX | PFRCX / RCEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.29 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.29 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.836 | 6.295 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 881M | 10B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.97 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 4.48 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.66 | 6.16 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.60 | -13.60 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.29 | -0.26 | 871% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement