Ad is loading...
PFRCX vs RCWBX
PFRCX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts PFRCX vs RCWBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) C
Price$7.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.39M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.04B
PFRCX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFRCX vs. RCWBX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFRCX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFRCX (683M). PFRCX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: PFRCX (3.12) vs RCWBX (2.59). PFRCX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: PFRCX (21 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). PFRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RCWBX (1.58). PFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 641.00 vs. RCWBX (251.00). RCWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFRCX: RCWBX (250) vs PFRCX (1000). PFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. RCWBX (6.81). PFRCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.23 vs. RCWBX (-11.01).
| PFRCX | RCWBX | PFRCX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.546 | 5.975 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 10B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.12 | 2.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.90 | 6.81 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.94 | 0.85 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.23 | -11.01 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.19 | -6.34 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers