Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFRCX vs RCWBX
PFRCX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts PFRCX vs RCWBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) C
Price$7.82
Change-$0.03 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.45M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.08
Change-$0.07 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.08B
PFRCX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFRCX vs. RCWBX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFRCX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. PFRCX (881M). PFRCX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: PFRCX (2.91) vs RCWBX (2.73). PFRCX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: PFRCX (21 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). PFRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RCWBX (1.58). PFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 646.00 vs. RCWBX (251.00). RCWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFRCX: RCWBX (250) vs PFRCX (1000). PFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. RCWBX (4.11). PFRCX return over 5 years is better than : -10.89 vs. RCWBX (-14.76).
| PFRCX | RCWBX | PFRCX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.249 | 5.881 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 881M | 10.1B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.73 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | 4.11 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.07 | 5.05 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.89 | -14.76 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.91 | -3.32 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers