Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFRCX vs RCWBX
PFRCX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts PFRCX vs RCWBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) C
Price$7.88
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets812.95M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.23
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.95B
PFRCX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFRCX vs. RCWBX commentary
Jun 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFRCX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 9.95B vs. PFRCX (813M). PFRCX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: PFRCX (3.02) vs RCWBX (2.53). PFRCX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: PFRCX (21 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). PFRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RCWBX (1.58). PFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 641.00 vs. RCWBX (251.00). RCWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFRCX: RCWBX (250) vs PFRCX (1000). PFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. RCWBX (6.26). PFRCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.57 vs. RCWBX (-13.50).
| PFRCX | RCWBX | PFRCX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.100 | 6.040 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 9.95B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 2.53 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.02 | 6.26 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.33 | 3.59 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.57 | -13.50 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.96 | -3.88 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement