Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFRCX vs RCWBX
PFRCX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts PFRCX vs RCWBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) C
Price$7.88
Change-$0.02 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets930.48M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.27
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10B
PFRCX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFRCX vs. RCWBX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFRCX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFRCX (930M). PFRCX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: PFRCX (3.02) vs RCWBX (2.78). PFRCX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: PFRCX (21 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). PFRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RCWBX (1.58). PFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 646.00 vs. RCWBX (251.00). RCWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFRCX: RCWBX (250) vs PFRCX (1000). PFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. RCWBX (3.45). PFRCX return over 5 years is better than : -13.57 vs. RCWBX (-15.88).
| PFRCX | RCWBX | PFRCX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.956 | 7.132 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 10B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 2.78 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 3.45 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.25 | 3.61 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.57 | -15.88 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.50 | -2.59 | 58% |