Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFRCX vs RCWHX
PFRCX vs RCWHX Comparison
Open Charts PFRCX vs RCWHX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) C
Price$7.83
Change-$0.03 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets812.95M
American Funds Capital World Bond R5E
Price$16.33
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
PFRCX vs RCWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFRCX vs. RCWHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFRCX is a Hold and RCWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWHX has more cash in the bank: 9.97B vs. PFRCX (813M). RCWHX pays higher dividends than PFRCX: RCWHX (3.41) vs PFRCX (3.02). PFRCX was incepted earlier than RCWHX: PFRCX (21 years) vs RCWHX (10 years). PFRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RCWHX (0.64). PFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 641.00 vs. RCWHX (251.00). RCWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFRCX: RCWHX (250) vs PFRCX (1000). PFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.55 vs. RCWHX (5.32). PFRCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.57 vs. RCWHX (-10.11).
| PFRCX | RCWHX | PFRCX / RCWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.64 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.64 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.100 | 5.761 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 9.97B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 3.41 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.55 | 5.32 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.89 | 3.31 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.57 | -10.11 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement