Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFRCX vs RCWHX
PFRCX vs RCWHX Comparison
Open Charts PFRCX vs RCWHX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) C
Price$7.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.45M
American Funds Capital World Bond R5E
Price$16.31
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.03B
PFRCX vs RCWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFRCX vs. RCWHX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFRCX is a Hold and RCWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWHX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFRCX (881M). RCWHX pays higher dividends than PFRCX: RCWHX (3.60) vs PFRCX (2.91). PFRCX was incepted earlier than RCWHX: PFRCX (21 years) vs RCWHX (10 years). PFRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RCWHX (0.64). PFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 646.00 vs. RCWHX (251.00). RCWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFRCX: RCWHX (250) vs PFRCX (1000). PFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. RCWHX (5.16). RCWHX (-11.05) and PFRCX (-11.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFRCX | RCWHX | PFRCX / RCWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.64 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.64 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.836 | 6.689 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 881M | 10B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 3.60 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 5.16 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.66 | 8.01 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.60 | -11.05 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement