PFS
Price
$18.23
Change
-$0.22 (-1.19%)
Updated
Jul 31, 12:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
85 days until earnings call
SFST
Price
$42.28
Change
-$1.03 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
247.62M
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs SFST

Header iconPFS vs SFST Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs SFSTBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$18.23
Change-$0.22 (-1.19%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.1B
Southern First Bancshares
Price$42.28
Change-$1.03 (-2.38%)
Volume$27.8K
Capitalization247.62M
PFS vs SFST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. SFST commentary
Jul 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and SFST is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 31, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $18.45 vs. SFST: $42.28)
Brand notoriety: PFS and SFST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 81% vs. SFST: 138%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $1.1B vs. SFST: $247.62M
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.1B. SFST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $247.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than SFST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFST is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while SFST (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

SFST is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than SFST($248M). SFST has higher P/E ratio than PFS: SFST (18.29) vs PFS (8.49). SFST YTD gains are higher at: 6.365 vs. PFS (0.379). SFST has less debt than PFS: SFST (311M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than SFST: PFS (479M) vs SFST (87.5M).
PFSSFSTPFS / SFST
Capitalization1.1B248M442%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.3796.3656%
P/E Ratio8.4918.2946%
Revenue479M87.5M547%
Total Cash189MN/A-
Total Debt1.46B311M469%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs SFST: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
SFST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2010
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4970
SMR RATING
1..100
1241
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9365
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (30) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.

SFST's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

SFST's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (93) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSSFST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GNWRX32.58N/A
N/A
Nationwide R
TEMTX26.31N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Shares C
JRSTX12.34N/A
N/A
JH Adaptive Risk Mgd U.S. Eq T
BGLAX14.28N/A
N/A
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
WQAUX12.21N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality AllCap Ultra

SFST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFST has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFST jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFST
1D Price
Change %
SFST100%
-2.38%
TCBK - SFST
75%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
AROW - SFST
75%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
TRMK - SFST
75%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
PFS - SFST
74%
Closely correlated
-4.30%
FCBC - SFST
74%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
More