PFS
Price
$17.11
Change
-$0.09 (-0.52%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
75 days until earnings call
SMBC
Price
$53.28
Change
-$0.04 (-0.08%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
497.01M
78 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PFS vs SMBC

Header iconPFS vs SMBC Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs SMBCBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$17.11
Change-$0.09 (-0.52%)
Volume$754.45K
Capitalization1.1B
Southern Missouri Ban
Price$53.28
Change-$0.04 (-0.08%)
Volume$15.17K
Capitalization497.01M
PFS vs SMBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. SMBC commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and SMBC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $17.11 vs. SMBC: $53.28)
Brand notoriety: PFS and SMBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 101% vs. SMBC: 59%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $1.1B vs. SMBC: $497.01M
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.1B. SMBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $497.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than SMBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the short-term than SMBC.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while SMBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

SMBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than SMBC($497M). SMBC has higher P/E ratio than PFS: SMBC (11.19) vs PFS (8.49). SMBC YTD gains are higher at: -6.775 vs. PFS (-8.163). SMBC has less debt than PFS: SMBC (136M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than SMBC: PFS (479M) vs SMBC (167M).
PFSSMBCPFS / SMBC
Capitalization1.1B497M221%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.163-6.775120%
P/E Ratio8.4911.1976%
Revenue479M167M287%
Total Cash189MN/A-
Total Debt1.46B136M1,073%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs SMBC: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
SMBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2079
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4932
SMR RATING
1..100
911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1543
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (37) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (61). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (49). This means that SMBC’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (11). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (56). This means that SMBC’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (43). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSSMBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSRIX49.180.35
+0.72%
Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares
MXETX11.69N/A
N/A
Empower Core Strategies US Eq Inv
FAMWX101.66-0.12
-0.12%
FAM Value Institutional
HILFX29.45-0.04
-0.14%
Hennessy Large Cap Financial Instl
CSSJX23.69-0.13
-0.55%
Carillon Chartwell Small Cap C

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
-0.52%
BHLB - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
HOPE - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
FFBC - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
SFNC - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
PPBI - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More

SMBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBC has been closely correlated with CAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBC jumps, then CAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBC
1D Price
Change %
SMBC100%
-0.08%
CAC - SMBC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
CTBI - SMBC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
EQBK - SMBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
UBSI - SMBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
MBWM - SMBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More