PFS
Price
$18.53
Change
-$0.21 (-1.12%)
Updated
Jul 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
13 days until earnings call
WSFS
Price
$58.23
Change
-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.71B
12 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs WSFS

Header iconPFS vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs WSFSBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$18.53
Change-$0.21 (-1.12%)
Volume$5.27K
Capitalization1.1B
WSFS Financial
Price$58.23
Change-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Volume$450.4K
Capitalization2.71B
PFS vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. WSFS commentary
Jul 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and WSFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $18.79 vs. WSFS: $58.23)
Brand notoriety: PFS and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 80% vs. WSFS: 131%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $1.1B vs. WSFS: $2.71B
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.1B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than WSFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($2.71B) has a higher market cap than PFS($1.1B). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than PFS: WSFS (10.04) vs PFS (8.49). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 10.224 vs. PFS (2.228). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. PFS (189M). WSFS has less debt than PFS: WSFS (895M) vs PFS (1.46B). WSFS has higher revenues than PFS: WSFS (1.02B) vs PFS (479M).
PFSWSFSPFS / WSFS
Capitalization1.1B2.71B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.22810.22422%
P/E Ratio8.4910.0485%
Revenue479M1.02B47%
Total Cash189M606M31%
Total Debt1.46B895M163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
198
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4633
SMR RATING
1..100
1212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (40) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (70). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (46). This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (12). This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (44). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (29). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DQIRX32.88N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund I
MFMIX17.13N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Next Gen Em Mkts I
SWSCX19.56N/A
N/A
Schwab Small-Cap Equity
PROVX19.45N/A
N/A
Provident Trust Strategy
ACIPX16.21N/A
N/A
American Century Mid Cap Value G