Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSAX vs RPFGX
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts PFSAX vs RPFGX
PGIM Jennison Financial Services A
Price$24.95
Change+$0.27 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.08M
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. PFSAX (173M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than PFSAX: RPFGX (1.35) vs PFSAX (0.36). PFSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: PFSAX (26 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). PFSAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). PFSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). PFSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). PFSAX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.50 vs. PFSAX (11.21). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 115.85 vs. PFSAX (78.62).
| PFSAX | RPFGX | PFSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.444 | 14.440 | 52% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 116% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 1.12B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.35 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.21 | 22.50 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.03 | 67.80 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.62 | 115.85 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.41 | 89.19 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers