Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFUNX vs RCWBX
PFUNX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts PFUNX vs RCWBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) I-3
Price$7.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets930.48M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.30
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10B
PFUNX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFUNX vs. RCWBX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFUNX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFUNX (930M). PFUNX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: PFUNX (4.01) vs RCWBX (2.78). PFUNX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: PFUNX (7 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). RCWBX (1.58) is less costly to investors than PFUNX (0.97). PFUNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 646.00 vs. RCWBX (251.00). RCWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFUNX: RCWBX (250) vs PFUNX (1000000). PFUNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. RCWBX (3.33). PFUNX return over 5 years is better than : -9.47 vs. RCWBX (-15.73).
| PFUNX | RCWBX | PFUNX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.58 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.58 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.167 | 7.330 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 10B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.01 | 2.78 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 3.33 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.35 | 4.18 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.47 | -15.73 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement