Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFUNX vs RCWHX
PFUNX vs RCWHX Comparison
Open Charts PFUNX vs RCWHX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) I-3
Price$7.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets930.48M
American Funds Capital World Bond R5E
Price$16.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10B
PFUNX vs RCWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFUNX vs. RCWHX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFUNX is a Hold and RCWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWHX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFUNX (930M). PFUNX pays higher dividends than RCWHX: PFUNX (4.01) vs RCWHX (3.68). PFUNX was incepted earlier than RCWHX: PFUNX (7 years) vs RCWHX (10 years). PFUNX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RCWHX (0.64). PFUNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 646.00 vs. RCWHX (251.00). RCWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFUNX: RCWHX (250) vs PFUNX (1000000). PFUNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. RCWHX (4.31). PFUNX return over 5 years is better than : -9.47 vs. RCWHX (-12.08).
| PFUNX | RCWHX | PFUNX / RCWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.64 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.64 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.167 | 7.931 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 10B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.01 | 3.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 4.31 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.35 | 6.86 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.47 | -12.08 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement