Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFUPX vs RCEBX
PFUPX vs RCEBX Comparison
Open Charts PFUPX vs RCEBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) I-2
Price$7.83
Change-$0.03 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets812.95M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2E
Price$16.30
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
PFUPX vs RCEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFUPX vs. RCEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFUPX is a Hold and RCEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEBX has more cash in the bank: 9.97B vs. PFUPX (813M). PFUPX pays higher dividends than RCEBX: PFUPX (4.03) vs RCEBX (2.77). PFUPX was incepted earlier than RCEBX: PFUPX (17 years) vs RCEBX (11 years). RCEBX (1.29) is less costly to investors than PFUPX (0.87). PFUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 641.00 vs. RCEBX (251.00). RCEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFUPX: RCEBX (250) vs PFUPX (1000000). PFUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.69 vs. RCEBX (4.64). PFUPX return over 5 years is better than : -4.67 vs. RCEBX (-12.66).
| PFUPX | RCEBX | PFUPX / RCEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.29 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.29 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.567 | 5.469 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 9.97B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.03 | 2.77 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.69 | 4.64 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.20 | 1.63 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.67 | -12.66 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.16 | -1.52 | -470% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement