Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFUPX vs RCEBX
PFUPX vs RCEBX Comparison
Open Charts PFUPX vs RCEBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) I-2
Price$7.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets930.48M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2E
Price$16.47
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10B
PFUPX vs RCEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFUPX vs. RCEBX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFUPX is a Hold and RCEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEBX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFUPX (930M). PFUPX pays higher dividends than RCEBX: PFUPX (4.06) vs RCEBX (3.03). PFUPX was incepted earlier than RCEBX: PFUPX (17 years) vs RCEBX (11 years). RCEBX (1.29) is less costly to investors than PFUPX (0.87). PFUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 646.00 vs. RCEBX (251.00). RCEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFUPX: RCEBX (250) vs PFUPX (1000000). PFUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. RCEBX (3.57). PFUPX return over 5 years is better than : -9.24 vs. RCEBX (-14.62).
| PFUPX | RCEBX | PFUPX / RCEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.29 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.29 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.200 | 7.470 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 10B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.06 | 3.03 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 3.57 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 4.96 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.24 | -14.62 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.14 | 0.52 | 1,742% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement