Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFUPX vs RCWBX
PFUPX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts PFUPX vs RCWBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) I-2
Price$7.88
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets812.95M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.23
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.95B
PFUPX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFUPX vs. RCWBX commentary
Jun 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFUPX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 9.95B vs. PFUPX (813M). PFUPX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: PFUPX (4.03) vs RCWBX (2.53). PFUPX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: PFUPX (17 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). RCWBX (1.58) is less costly to investors than PFUPX (0.87). PFUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 641.00 vs. RCWBX (251.00). RCWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFUPX: RCWBX (250) vs PFUPX (1000000). PFUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. RCWBX (6.26). PFUPX return over 5 years is better than : -4.67 vs. RCWBX (-13.50).
| PFUPX | RCWBX | PFUPX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.58 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.58 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.567 | 6.040 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 9.95B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.03 | 2.53 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 6.26 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.72 | 3.59 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.67 | -13.50 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.70 | -3.88 | -173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement