Ad is loading...
PFUPX vs RCWBX
PFUPX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts PFUPX vs RCWBX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) I-2
Price$7.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.39M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.04B
PFUPX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFUPX vs. RCWBX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFUPX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFUPX (683M). PFUPX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: PFUPX (4.17) vs RCWBX (2.59). PFUPX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: PFUPX (17 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). RCWBX (1.58) is less costly to investors than PFUPX (0.87). PFUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 641.00 vs. RCWBX (251.00). RCWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFUPX: RCWBX (250) vs PFUPX (1000000). PFUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.07 vs. RCWBX (6.81). PFUPX return over 5 years is better than : -1.23 vs. RCWBX (-11.01).
| PFUPX | RCWBX | PFUPX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.58 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.58 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.822 | 5.975 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 10B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.17 | 2.59 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.07 | 6.81 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.09 | 0.85 | 483% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.23 | -11.01 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.92 | -6.34 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers