Ad is loading...
PGC
Price
$36.37
Change
+$0.61 (+1.71%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
62 days until earnings call
WASH
Price
$37.41
Change
+$0.81 (+2.21%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PGC vs WASH

Header iconPGC vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts PGC vs WASHBanner chart's image
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
Price$36.37
Change+$0.61 (+1.71%)
Volume$476.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Washington Trust Ban
Price$37.41
Change+$0.81 (+2.21%)
Volume$174.16K
CapitalizationN/A
PGC vs WASH Comparison Chart
Loading...
PGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGC vs. WASH commentary
Nov 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGC is a Sell and WASH is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 24, 2024
Stock price -- (PGC: $36.37 vs. WASH: $37.41)
Brand notoriety: PGC and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGC: 493% vs. WASH: 145%
Market capitalization -- PGC: $428.6M vs. WASH: $448.06M
PGC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $428.6M. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $448.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PGC is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PGC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PGC and WASH are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PGC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

PGC is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WASH($448M) and PGC($429M) have the same market capitalization . WASH (9.33) and PGC (8.96) have similar P/E ratio . PGC (22.868) and WASH (22.529) have similar YTD gains . PGC has less debt than WASH: PGC (553M) vs WASH (1.25B). PGC has higher revenues than WASH: PGC (226M) vs WASH (193M).
PGCWASHPGC / WASH
Capitalization429M448M96%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.86822.529102%
P/E Ratio8.969.3396%
Revenue226M193M117%
Total Cash7.4MN/A-
Total Debt553M1.25B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGC vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
PGC
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7081
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
2727
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
721
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGC's Valuation (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (65). This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (100). This means that PGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's SMR Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (27). This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (40). This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (21). This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGCWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOVCX25.870.42
+1.65%
First Trust/Confluence Small Cap Val C
GLPRX36.300.26
+0.72%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras R
JRSAX12.370.06
+0.49%
JH Adaptive Risk Mgd U.S. Eq A
POLIX49.560.18
+0.36%
Polen Growth Institutional
GGGIX61.280.04
+0.07%
Gabelli Global Growth I

PGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGC has been closely correlated with WASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGC jumps, then WASH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGC
1D Price
Change %
PGC100%
+1.71%
WASH - PGC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
SFNC - PGC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
THFF - PGC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
WSFS - PGC
80%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
WSBC - PGC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
More