Ad is loading...
PGWCX vs RGAHX
PGWCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGAHX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$29.40
Change+$0.85 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$68.60
Change+$1.70 (+2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
PGWCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. PGWCX (1.29B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: RGAHX (0.55) vs PGWCX (0.00). PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: PGWCX (41 years) vs RGAHX (9 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGAHX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. PGWCX (-2.86). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.97 vs. PGWCX (-4.13).
| PGWCX | RGAHX | PGWCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.44 | 391% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.44 | 391% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.856 | -6.590 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 267B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.86 | 1.64 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.57 | 14.67 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.13 | 44.97 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...